Posted: Monday, November 24, 2014 1:00 am | Updated: 10:37 am, Mon Nov 24, 2014.

The best news about Nebraska football after the weekend is there are no more home games.

Imagine if the Huskers hosted Penn State this weekend, and the tired Nittany Lions returned 3,000 tickets from their allotment. Would the beloved, last-thing-we-have-to-hang-on-to Memorial Stadium sellout streak end?

That’s the dangerous terrain NU Athletic Director Shawn Eichorst must navigate as he decides on what to do with his football program.

For all the Husker football cornerstones that have been upended in recent times — the nine-win streak, the bowl streak and now 15 years without a conference title — woe be the A.D. under whom the 340-game sellout run stops.

This football season and this head coach have brought us to this point.

Between the current states of apathy and anger among fans, how does NU “sell” football if coach Bo Pelini returns? The phone calls and texts I got from friends and contacts of all ages Saturday night tell me it won’t be easy.

As always, a few facts are in order:

Nebraska plays in arguably the weakest division in what inarguably is the least-respected Power Five conference. The Huskers, with a seventh-year head coach, have fallen to no better than third in the Big Ten West.

It may be fourth place out of seven after Friday’s trip to Iowa, where the Hawkeyes were snorting angrily Saturday after a heartbreaking loss to Wisconsin.

The West Division programs that have moved past NU with back-to-back wins in the series are Wisconsin, with a second-year head coach and the shakiest quarterback play ever on a nine-win team; and Minnesota, with a fourth-year head coach who has had to work around a major health issue and recruit to facilities that are worse than some high schools.

Doubly troubling is that the Badgers and Gophers not only beat the Huskers, but beat them up, too, with Nebraska’s old power football style.

I hear Eichorst is a huge fan of “Moneyball” and the assorted metrics some use to try to game the competition. But you don’t need a computer screen full of formulas to figure out Nebraska’s current approach won’t lead to championships in this setting.

Regarding Eichorst, we’re forced to say “I hear” a lot because of his ultra-guarded management style, and the layer of old chums he has hired — also not available for interviews — to insulate him.

When he was the A.D. at Miami, his nickname was “The Invisible Man.” The past three weeks, I’ve spent a lot of time around Wisconsin, which is where Eichorst grew up and used to work under Barry Alvarez. Folks there wryly ask how we get along with “Silent Shawn.”

Eichorst emerged for one of the few times last May at the Big Ten administrative meetings, covered by The World-Herald, to say this about Pelini:

“He’s a good ball coach, a good person, he’s serious about his craft and he’s very disciplined. We’re lucky to have him at Nebraska.”

In August, in Eichorst’s first sit-down with any group of reporters after nearly two years on the job, he said: “I hope I don’t come off as someone not willing to share information or someone who has a grand plan behind the scenes.”

Too late on that one, though we were warned.

When hired, Eichorst said his goal was in five years for hardly anyone to know his name. For Chancellor Harvey Perlman, selecting that style of leader was no surprise after dealing with the egomania of a former athletic director who shall not be named.

That said, I’ve never seen effective leadership from someone who burrows into his office and sets up policies that almost banish communication — especially in running a high-profile athletic department, and even more so at straight-shooting Nebraska.

You can’t lead from behind or the dark.

Eichorst told us in August that he has strong relationships with his head coaches. That is counter to what coaches have told me and many others. Some say they can’t directly get a meeting with him. One said the number of books Eichorst has assigned coaches to read has outnumbered his in-person visits to that sport.

Also from that preseason interview, Eichorst said football was “going in the right direction,” and he expressed confidence that the sellout streak will carry on.

What does Eichorst, at $1.03 million a year, say now?

Who knows? He didn’t respond to text messages Saturday or Sunday seeking comment, nor did his $132,000-a-year-aide who handles interview requests.

This isn’t media whining, folks. I don’t pout over being stood up by administrators or coaches. But our job is to answer questions of readers, fans and ticket-buyers — the “stockholders” of the program. The only frustration is the stone-walling on information you deserve.

Like whom Eichorst would hire if he makes a change? And who would he know to hire?

He has hired a women’s rifle coach at Nebraska. Ten days after he was hired at Miami, the Hurricanes picked Jim Larranaga as men’s basketball coach, so he probably had some hand in that.

Also, at Nebraska, in 2014, Eichorst extended Pelini’s contract by one year after the football team went 4-3 down the stretch, but did nothing to the contract of Tim Miles, who led the men’s basketball team to the NCAA tournament for the first time in 16 years.

So what lies ahead? We’ll have to see what the man behind the curtain comes up with — and if he is standing there with a handful of tickets

.Barfknecht: Is Husker sellout streak the next cornerstone to tumble?

You need to be a member of Huskerspot3 to add comments!

Join Huskerspot3

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • hen things get tense at Nebraska, when the pressure of the job and the thirst of the fan base starts to weigh on Bo Pelini, he appears to have a defense mechanism.

    Whether it's orchestrated or instinctual, Pelini's trigger response to criticism is daring Nebraska to fire him.

    He did it last season when things started to go the wrong way. Heck, he sort of did it in the audio clip that surfaced when Pelini, following a 2011 win against Ohio State, basically told the fan base and administration in an expletive-laced rant, "Good luck trying to do better than me." Then once again last week, Pelini responded to a critical caller on his radio show by saying, "If (this) isn't the right direction you have a conversation with (athletics director) Shawn Eichorst and they're free to go in another direction."

    FOOTBALL FOUR: Rating and debating college football and the Playoff

    One of these days, Nebraska is going to take Pelini up on that offer.

    Because at some point, the notion that Nebraska fans expect too much or that the job isn't what it used to be or that a return to Tom Osborne-era dominance is impossible has no relationship to the evaluation of Pelini's job performance.

    Strip all that extraneous stuff away, just look at where the Nebraska program is right now relative to its peers and ask whether that's good enough. The answer is no.

    After seven years of Pelini, Nebraska fans know what they have and what they're going to get. And at some point, if the program has become incapable of winning anything meaningful, that's a problem Nebraska needs to address regardless of Pelini's overall record (66-27) or the fact he has never had a bad season by any standard.

    But don't let anyone — including Pelini — tell you that that Nebraska should just be happy with its nine wins a year because this isn't 1994 anymore. Look behind the numbers. Pelini's best win this season? Over a mediocre Miami team. Last year? Nebraska didn't beat anyone with a pulse until it survived, 24-19, against a beat-up Georgia team in the Gator Bowl.

    Meanwhile, Nebraska losing to ranked teams has become so routine and predictable, you barely even need to watch with just two wins in its last 10. At 8-1, the Cornhuskers had a chance to turn that narrative around but a 59-24 loss to Wisconsin dropped them out of the race for anything significant. Then, they backed it up with a 28-24 home loss to Minnesota. Minnesota, for goodness sakes.

    Does unhappiness with that trend sound like a spoiled fan base that doesn't appreciate Pelini the way it should, or does it sound like a fan base justifiably ready to see if they can indeed do better?

    As Nebraska stumbles toward the end of the season, we may be getting ready to find out.

    (Disclaimer: This isn't a ranking of worst teams, worst losses or coaches whose jobs are in the most jeopardy. This is simply a measurement of a fan base's knee-jerk reaction to what they last saw. The way in which a team won or lost, expectations vis-à-vis program trajectory and traditional inferiority complex of fan base all factor into this ranking.)

    (Disclaimer No. 2: By virtue of their decision to make coaching changes, Florida, SMU, Kansas, Troy and Buffalo are hereby excluded from this and future editions of the Misery Index, as fans can look forward to a new regime taking hold in 2015.)

    COACHES HOT SEAT

    • Nish,

      Are we still having this Bo Pelini debate concerning the same old topics?  Our best win this year was against a now five (5) loss Miami team?  Bo now has 27 total losses with a decent chance of losing two more this year at Iowa and against Arkansas in the Music City Bowl if that pans out.   At some point in time it seems that someone with authority would say that Bo has accomplished all he can at Nebraska.  Bo and the fellas are all great talkers, but the record speaks for itself.  If it we not for the powder puff wins over the last seven years and the very lucky comeback wins against some of the worst teams in college football,  he would be at or below 500 most likely. Once you take away the poor performances on the field, we still have Bo the mouth to put up with.  He hasn't changed his ways since he lied to us after the Texas A& M debacle.  Bo says the players DESERVE to lose and we as fans DESERVE Bo because many support the $10,000.00 man (Iowa 2013).   Just wait till next year!  LOL.

This reply was deleted.